Jan Anderson, PSYD, LPCC

Browse the Latest Issue

A Founding Father and an Estranged Son

The revolution that broke Benjamin Franklin’s family

Every Fourth of July, Americans celebrate Benjamin Franklin as one of the great architects of independence. We picture the kite in the storm, the clever sayings, the diplomacy, the brilliance of a man who helped shape a nation.

What we talk about far less is the son he lost along the way.

Not to death. To estrangement.

Benjamin Franklin’s relationship with his son William became one of the most painful family fractures in early American history. What makes the story especially heartbreaking is that it did not begin with bitterness.

It began with closeness.

Benjamin invested heavily in William’s future from the beginning. William was born out of wedlock, which carried enormous social stigma at the time, yet Benjamin openly acknowledged him, raised him, and mentored him.

William deeply admired his father. For years, they appeared unusually bonded. William traveled with him, worked alongside him, and benefited from Benjamin’s growing influence and status.

That context matters because it helps explain why the eventual split felt so personal to Benjamin Franklin. In his mind, this was not just political disagreement.

It felt like betrayal.

When Politics Became Personal

As the colonies split politically, the Franklin family split emotionally.

Benjamin Franklin, sometimes described as a “reluctant revolutionary,” eventually became one of the most articulate voices for independence. He expected that William could be persuaded to do likewise and was bitterly disappointed when his son remained loyal to the British Crown.

And the fracture spread across generations.

Benjamin’s grandson, William Temple Franklin, eventually aligned himself with his grandfather rather than his father. Suddenly this was no longer simply a disagreement between father and son. It became a painful triangle of divided loyalties inside the same family.

That part feels painfully modern.

Once families fracture, people often start feeling pressure—directly or indirectly—to choose sides. Children, siblings, spouses, grandchildren, in-laws. A conflict that began between two people quietly spreads across generations, pulling grandchildren and extended family into emotional territory they never intended to occupy.

Relationships break when disagreement stops feeling like a difference of opinion and starts feeling like rejection.

At first, people argue about opinions. Then they begin defending identities.

Once that happens, conversations stop feeling safe. Every comment starts sounding like a test of loyalty, morality, intelligence, or character. Gatherings become tense. Conversations become guarded. People begin monitoring themselves, deciding what can and cannot be said. And relationships can crack under that kind of pressure.

Most of us were never taught how to stay emotionally connected during profound disagreement. We were taught how to win arguments. How to defend ourselves. How to gather evidence. How to decide who is right.

Benjamin Franklin eventually compared his son William to Benedict Arnold: “I know not which of them is the greatest villain.”

You can hear the contempt inside the anger. And underneath contempt, there is often a relationship that once mattered deeply. And years later, William wrote sadly of his father: “The father’s political resentment has, I fear, in a great measure extinguished his natural affection.”

That line is devastating because underneath it is something deeply human: I still wanted my father.

For many estranged parents and adult children today, that emotional ache feels very familiar.

Holding Two Truths at the Same Time

The families that endure are rarely the ones who agree on everything. People can tolerate disagreement better than they can tolerate being treated with contempt. What matters is feeling that you still matter.

The Jedi mind trick that makes relationships survive disagreement is surprisingly simple — and deceptively hard:

The ability to hold two truths at the same time.

I love you. And I vehemently disagree with you.

I think your political opinions are completely wrong. And I still want you at the table.

I don’t understand how you see the world this way. And I still care about your life, your health, your happiness, and whether you got home safely.

It’s a container big enough to hold everything you know about the other person — everything you love, enjoy, and admire — and in that very same space, what you’re completely appalled by.

Here’s how one of my clients learned to think about it: “Somehow, no matter how twisted, flawed, screwed up, dead wrong, or annoying you are, I want to spend a little time with you.”

It’s a mindset that enables you to ask questions like: What can we enjoy together that has absolutely nothing to do with our disagreements? Maybe it’s cooking out. Watching football. Talking about the grandchildren. Working in the yard. Sharing old stories. Making fun of the same ridiculous neighbors.

Why It Feels So Hard Right Now

Social media rewards outrage. Conflict entrepreneurs get rich by convincing people that outrage is moral clarity and contempt is wisdom. News cycles increasingly encourage us to sort people into simplistic “either/or” categories rather than recognize complex human beings capable of goodness, flaws, and massive contradictions.

Knowing Your Limits

It does not mean tolerating abuse, cruelty, intimidation, or endless hostility. It means knowing your limits.

Not every topic needs to be discussed. Not every gathering needs to become a debate stage. Not every inflammatory comment deserves engagement.

And not every relationship can be repaired. Some people remain deeply reactive, manipulative, hostile, rigid, or emotionally unsafe no matter how thoughtfully you approach them. Sometimes distance truly is the healthiest option.

But even then, the work still matters. Learning emotional regulation. Building distress tolerance. Practicing “both/and” thinking. Knowing your limits. Setting boundaries around what you will and will not tolerate.

Those things change you. Not because they magically erase conflict or fix every relationship, but because they help you suffer less inside your own nervous system. You become less reactive. Less consumed by the need to persuade, defend, or win. You stop needing every conversation to end in agreement in order to feel okay.

That kind of steadiness is empowering — and it can be contagious.

One client told me about a conversation with a relative who said, “I just wish people would stop voting for these psychopaths.”

My client replied, “Finally, something we can agree on!”

Situation diffused. Conversation moved on. Connection intact.

The Part History Leaves Out

Benjamin and William Franklin never repaired their relationship. Late in life, when William reached out in hopes of reconciliation, Benjamin rebuffed him and disinherited him.

That part matters too, because it reminds us that even brilliant people can become trapped inside their pain.

Holding On to Humanity

This Independence Day, while fireworks light the sky and families gather around tables, many people will quietly feel the ache of someone missing. A son who no longer calls. A daughter who feels emotionally far away. A sibling no one knows how to talk to anymore. A family member everyone avoids mentioning.

If that is part of your story, you are far from alone. Families have struggled with these same human tensions for centuries: identity, values, hurt, judgment, disappointment, longing, and the deep desire to feel understood by the people we love most.

The technology changes. The politics change. Human nature doesn’t change nearly as much as we think.

And sometimes healing begins not when people finally agree, but when someone becomes emotionally strong enough to hold complexity without losing connection entirely.

If this feels familiar, sometimes a thoughtful outside perspective can make a surprising difference.

If you’re curious what that process might look like, I offer brief, no-pressure consultations where we can sort through what’s happening and identify what might move things forward, at a pace that respects everyone involved.

PS: Even one conversation can bring a surprising amount of clarity to what’s been feeling stuck.